New Delhi, 27 August  2008

Press Release

 

Power Theft: In separate cases, Special Court sends 2 ‘Makan Maliks’ - to Jail

 

In separate cases, Special Court of Electricity, Patparganj has sent two ‘makan maliks’, accused of power theft to jail. While Rashid – owner of nine flats in Rang Mahal in Darya Ganj and a habitual power thief had been caught stealing and illegally distributing 41 KW for domestic purposes, Rajender Kumar Malhotra – owner of a large premise in Tank Road – along with his tenants was caught stealing 18 KW of electricity for industrial purposes.

 

All the accused have now been given bail, but only after spending a few days in jail or by paying surety amounts of Rs 50,000 each. Moreover, the Court has also refused to dismiss their pleas for dismissing the respective cases.

 

Case of Rashid - Owner of 9 flats in ‘Rang Mahal’, Daryaganj – arrested for stealing electricity for 2nd time

 

  • Bail application, citing his track record, rejected in his first attempt
  • In Dec 07, caught stealing  41 KW electricity and distributing it to his tenants, penalised Rs 6.7 lakh
  • Earlier caught in May 2006 stealing 51.5 KW, penalised Rs 9.9 lakh
  • Next hearing for the May 2006 case scheduled for 13 October 2008

 

Rashid, owner of 9 flats in ‘Rang Mahal’, Daryaganj and a habitual power thief was arrested and sent to Judicial custody for stealing electricity by the Special Court. Rashid had rented out the flats to various tenants. A BSES enforcement raid in December 2007, had found these flats cumulatively stealing 41 KW of electricity for domestic purposes. Investigations revealed that Rashid, was illegally tapping electricity from a nearby BSES service line and illegally distributing electricity to these flats. According to the provisions of the Indian Electricity Act 2003, a penalty of Rs 6.70 lakh was imposed on him. When the accused failed to deposit the same within a stipulated timeframe, a case was filed in the Special Court. It is also pertinent to mention that the accused was grated bail, only in his second attempt. Rejecting his bail in his first attempt, the Court order read, “Keeping in view the gravity of the offence and the conduct of the accused, I do not find it a case fit for grant of bail. Application is hence dismissed”.

 

Incidentally, this was the second time Rashid had been caught stealing electricity. An earlier raid in May 2006, had found him stealing 51.5 KW of electricity. Investigations at the time revealed that he had never applied for an electricity connection. A penalty of Rs 9.9 lakh was imposed on him. After the accused failed to deposit the penalty amount within the stipulated time, a case was filed in the Special Court. Since the accused was absconding, both bailable and non bailable warrants were issued against him.  The next date of hearing in the first case filed against him is scheduled for 13 October 2008.

 

A noteworthy aspect about this case is that the accused, even after being caught in 2006, chose to continue stealing electricity, rather than take a legal connection.

 

Case of Rajender Kr Malhotra & tenants – arrested for stealing 18 KW of electricity for industrial purposes

 

  • Rajender Kumar Malhotra had rented his premises without any electricity connection
  • Premises was being used for running an clothes stitching and ironing unit, penalized Rs 10.53 L
  • Cheque of Rs 3.5 lakh towards part penalty payment made by him was dishonoured
  • His bail in the first attempt was rejected
  • His tenants were released on bail  after paying a surety amount of Rs 50,000 each

 

Rajender Kumar Malhotra, owner of E – 16/925-T Padam Singh Road, Khalsa Nagar, Tank Road was arrested and sent to judicial custody by the Special Court. His tenants, Vinod and Kailash were also arrested but later released on bail, but only after paying a surety amount of Rs 50,000 each

 

 

 

 

 

A BYPL enforcement raid in January 2007, had found the three stealing 18 KW of electricity for industrial purposes. The stolen electricity was used for running a factory for stitching and ironing of clothes. Investigations into the case revealed that Rajinder Kumar Malhotra had rented out his premises to Vinod and Kailash for running an industrial unit, without any electricity connection. Moreover, Malhotra used to regularly charge rent from his tenants for both the premise as well as for electricity.

 

According to provisions of the Indian Electricity Act 2002, a penalty bill of Rs 10.53 lakh was raised on the accused. Rajinder Kumar Malhotra – owner of the premises – even paid Rs 3.5 lakh as part payment. But, later the cheque given by him was dishonoured by the bank for lack of sufficient funds. Subsequently, BSES filed a case in the Special Court.

 

Like in Rashid’s case (above), it is pertinent to mention that in this case too, the accused was grated bail, only in his second attempt. Rejecting his bail application, the Court order read, “Accused Rajender Kumar Malhotra is charging the rent at a high rate not for the premises alone but for the electricity which was being consumed after committing theft…….In the circumstances, application for grant of bail in respect of accused Rajender Kumar Malhotra is dismissed”.

 

BSES, Delhi’s premier power distribution company, is committed to ensuring quality and reliable electricity supply to all its consumers.

 

 

For further information please contact:

 

Prashant Dua

Chandra P Kamat

Corporate Communications

Corporate Communications

39999870 / 9312007822

39999088/9350130304